The Problem With Typical Modesty
- July 30th, 2007
- By Scott Lee
- Write comment
What are your initial thoughts at the sight of a naked person? For many, the reaction is a negative one, filled with panic. Though considering the fact that nudity is the state at which we find ourselves when we bathe, when we have sex, when we’re asleep, it seems a silly notion that everyone has such negative feelings over something that seems to be so naturally positive in the scope of human existence. Recently I noticed that a blog called MInTheGap has started a blog “carnival of modesty.” Their first post on the matter, Hey, Check Me Out! attempts to portray an idea of moderation in the clothing that we wear to lead a more conducive lifestyle to those around us, mostly from a Christian perspective. Perhaps it is only the Christian perspective talking here, but I’m going to put aside any Christian perspective and attempt to look at this whole thing from an entirely natural perspective.

The first thing you probably want to do when you think about this whole thing of modesty is think back to, when it comes to the clothing definition of the word, think back to how clothes have evolved over time. Now, assuming that the Earth did not begin 6,000 years ago, human beings have been around for quite a while, and on an evolutionary time line, the contemporary conception of clothing has not. People did not dress in history for the sake of dressing, they dressed for the aid of survival. Fashion, and the entire idea of fashion, began to become something that happened naturally. If you were going to wear clothes – why not wear clothes that looked the best they possibly could? By nature, people have an artistic eye for anything they see around them. It is the reason we have a sense of order and a sense of chaos – there is an artist in every single human being.
Naturism, or the activity of being nude in a social context, has long been around for centuries, but the recent term naturism, coined off of the earlier version of simply nudism, has not been a clear cut idea until the past several decades. For instance, in Japan it was never thought beyond the norm for people to bathe together while nude in public baths, or on another note – nude beaches have been growing rare over the past several years. I think that the general notion that mankind is either in decline or on the rise holds true for nudity – people are getting more comfortable with sexuality over time but less comfortable over non-sexual nudity. Saying that, in itself, seems to conflict and contradict almost immediately.
Modesty, when it comes to clothes, is simply not being provocative, but when it comes to nudity – sexually provocative takes on a whole new meaning. It has been demonstrated, just in a single catalogue of nude photography, that whether or not something is sexually suggestive is open to perspective, all in the eye of the beholder.
Christians, as well as many other followers of particular beliefs, seem to have a common concern that if a woman is dressing too openly, showing either too much skin, wearing garments that emphasize parts of the body too much, or even just wearing something that’s skin tight is going to lure men too much to fantasize. Newsflash: men are going to fantasize no matter what you put the women in. Men are still fantasizing over the women who are covered from head to toe in robes, and the only thing showing is their eyes. Men are always going to fantasize. But it is not just the men.
Current society puts an emphasis on female beauty and male power. The dynamic can be switched, however, and has been switched before. Much of the time, roles of the genders commonly stick to their evolutionary compliments, but from time to time, the perceptions among society at large can change. Over recent years, it is said that men are caring more about their appearance than they used to, in correspondence with the huge anorexia craze. Human beings are sexual – get used to it. Human beings’ sexuality is nothing new, and repression of human sexuality often does more harm than good.
The answer to modesty, the answer to sexual provocation, is education. We do not have to repress, we need only to educate. Period.